Kral Ussery LLC, Certified Public Accountants
TX Office: (817) 416-6842
NV Office: (702) 565-2727

Advice to Cyber Insurance Buyers: You Are Not Alone

« Back to News List            Why finance executives should care about blockchain »

Advice to Cyber Insurance Buyers: You Are Not Alone

Cyber underwriters are using "security scores" to assess their clients' risks

Tuesday, May 9, 2017

By Lynda Bennett for CFO.com

The cyber insurance market continues to evolve, and the number of companies buying cyber insurance continues to expand. What’s more, that expanding cyber market offers a wide variety of coverage terms at different price points.

But companies interested in securing cyber insurance should know that the underwriting process requires careful diligence on their part. CFOs and risk managers need to have a firm grasp of the the processes insurers use — not only to price a policy but also to determine whether they will agree to underwrite the risk at all.

One of the first steps in the underwriting process requires the company to submit an application to the insurer. The application will seek baseline information about the company’s size, number of records maintained, type of information maintained, security policies and procedures, and disaster planning.

The company’s ability to answer those questions with complete and detailed information is critical. Comprehensive answers can help ensure that the policy will be competitively bid by a number of insurers and secure the lowest premium pricing.

Underwriters will be most interested in companies that can communicate effectively that they know where their records are maintained and how many records are at risk. They’re also more open to companies that have implemented strong security measures to protect their records and minimize the likelihood of a breach.

Further, cyber carriers will also look for representations in their application about whether the corporation — and sometimes what’s termed “any insured” (which means all employees) — has knowledge of claims, facts, or circumstances that can spawn a claim.

Some companies err by providing a response to that question without giving enough consideration as to who within the organization is being asked to make that representation or on whose behalf the representation will be made. The consequence of failing to understand the importance of these requested representations can be severe.

For example, let’s look at the experience of a hypothetical credit card company which has just disclosed a hacking incident that compromised many customer email accounts several years ago. In its current disclosure, the company admitted that some of its employees, including senior executives and attorneys, knew about the breach at the time of the incident.

Even though the company had applied for and bought a cyber insurance policy late last year, coverage in this fact scenario could be seriously at risk. That’s because employees previous knowledge of the facts could lead to a claim by the insurer objecting to the fact that the company hadn’t disclosed that knowledge for several years.

Further, basing their claim on these facts, some insurers may seek to rescind the entire policy, asserting that a material misrepresentation was made in the application. In other words, insurers may argue that they have no coverage obligation for the undisclosed known breach or any other claims that may arise because the policy was issued under false pretenses.

“Meet and Greet” Underwriting

Once the application has been submitted, the underwriters may want direct access to the chief information officer or others responsible for protecting company information. Companies must understand that those individuals will play a key role in whether the insurer will agree to quote and/or how much will be charged to insure the risks.

But most CIOs and other “techies” aren’t familiar with the insurance procurement process and may not understand how information should be communicated to the insurer. To avoid missteps, companies should have a detailed planning meeting with representatives of the insurer along with the insurance broker and coverage counsel before information is relayed to the underwriter.

Finally, many insurers conduct their own diligence to evaluate whether to underwrite a risk and, if so, at what premium price point. Risk managers and CFOs should be aware that insurers are using a new type of metric to assess their companies’ cyber risk exposure. It’s called a “security score” – a concept akin to a credit score.

For example, BitSight Technologies is a risk assessment vendor that analyzes companies for breach risk and response preparedness and assigns a security rating. According to its website, BitSight gathers data on security breaches from sensors deployed across the globe and uses algorithms to assess a company’s records management, encryption methods, and security vulnerabilities.

The firm then assigns a security rating and provides benchmarking information to demonstrate where the company falls short on the risk assessment spectrum. Companies on the lower end of the spectrum may not receive a quote for cyber insurance, while companies on the higher end may receive such better terms as lower premium or lower retentions. Companies looking to buy cyber coverage need to know that, in an important sense, they are not alone.

Related links:
http://ww2.cfo.com/cyber-security-technology/2017/05/cyber-insurance-underwriting/

IPO FAQs | IPO Process | Detailed IPO Process Steps
Home | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Site Map

Copyright © , Kral Ussery LLC, Certified Public Accountants All Rights Reserved

Web Presence By Netphoria Inc